Talk:Hanergy

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Beagel in topic Problems with this article
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hanergy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Problems with this article

edit

The main issue with this article is that it is very promotional by its tone done structure. Having separate sections such as cooperation agreements is an example of the biased structure: this information fits perfectly into the History section. Another issue is having a big number of very small subsections which violates WP:MOS. It would be better to use a standard structure for the company articles. Currently, this article uses a lot of company sources which a not neutral and promotion. Even more, Even more, a number of secondary sources were recently removed. One more issue is categorization: power companies categories apply only to the company who own or operates power stations and not for the companies producing equipment or technology for this (these companies are engineering and/or technology companies). Finally, I concerned about a number of SPAs who have edit or is editing here. I am not saying that these SPAs are connected to Hanergy but clear statement about their affeliations would be useful. I will try to fix some of these problems. Beagel (talk) 15:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)Reply