Talk:Hampton House (Chicago)

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Edy52285 in topic Removing "Adjacent Park" Section
Former good article nomineeHampton House (Chicago) was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 14, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

Failed GA

edit

Article is unreferenced. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 23:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sir, what's the difference between "notes" and "reference"?Wooyi 23:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Two references/notes does not a GA make. You can do better. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 23:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removing "Adjacent Park" Section

edit

I am removing the Adjacent Park section. The park itself would be a tangental subject which could just be referenced with a link, the same goes for Harold Washington. This sections however does not actually discuss the park or Harold Washington. It discusses the birds in the park and their connection to Harold Washington. To read about birds in the park, visit the link about the park, or read a page about parakeet monks in general (chicago is mentioned). To learn about Harold Washington's relationship to the birds, read the Harold Washington page. The birds are completely tangental to this building.

The final paragraph of this section seems to have been intended to complete the previous section about Recent History. I will leave this paragraph there, however, it needs to be completely rewritten, and perhaps removed as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edy52285 (talkcontribs) 08:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Reply