Talk:Hamilton Fish Park/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Epicgenius in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Comments edit

  • Short description goes at the top.
  • Add alt text to every image being used.
  • "restored again" → "restored"
  • "facades made" → "facades are made"
  • Remove the comma after "pool entrances".
  • "mayor Robert" → "Mayor Robert"
  • "bee reopened" - typo?
  • "a NYC Parks" → "an NYC Parks"
  • "wading pool; and" → "wading pool, and"
  • "at a cost of" → "for" (less wordy)
  • "New York City, it was" → "New York City, was"
  • Wikilink Edith Evans Asbury and Amy Sohn.

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks. I've fixed all of these. Epicgenius (talk) 04:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply