Talk:Hamilton Electors

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Seneca Quayle in topic Redirect to?

Redirect to? edit

I concur.

I think this content should be merged with Faithless elector revolt in the United States presidential election, 2016 and remain as a redirect only. TheCrazedBeast (talk) 00:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Further info suggests that this should actually redirect to Faithless elector since the term (and the supposed "revolt" in 2016) are also outlined in that article. TheCrazedBeast (talk) 15:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. The Hamilton Electors is an established group, with a name and a web-presence, etc. The "Revolt" is merely an observation on current events. Kortoso (talk) 19:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
Are you arguing that this page is about this specific organization? Doesn't the group exist only because of the current event? That's what they state on the website and they are specific to the 2016 election. I suppose you could argue the revolt is notable and warrants it's own article, but this page opens asserting it is about the term "Hamilton Electors" or something else that isn't clear to me (perhaps the org/website www.hamiltonelectors.com). If it's about the term itself then I reiterate my suggestion of a redirect to Faithless elector. If it's about the "group" then by their own assertion they are the representation of the revolt and this page is really a duplicate of Faithless elector revolt in the United States presidential election, 2016 and should be merged. TheCrazedBeast (talk) 21:25, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. Deletion. Redirection however, may be good idk. --Seneca Quayle (talk) 10:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Further dialog is requested to take place in this article's AfD discussion. Kortoso please visit there and add your input.