Talk:Hamearis lucina

Importance rating

This is a UK Biodiversity Action Plan (2007) species—GRM 15:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Imago

The Imago section is empty bar a photo --Alastair Rae (talk) 11:46, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Merger proposal

OK, it can (and should?) be done, but I don't have a lot of time. Will get to it when I can—GRM (talk) 21:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hamearis lucina/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Extremely lacking in information. Low level because its an individual species. -- IvanTortuga 02:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 02:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 19:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Why "Duke of Burgundy"???

I miss an explanation why they are called "Duke of Burgundy"... I consider this all the more sad - and, to be honest, a little despicable - as the main page quotation plays expressly on that designation... --Terminally uncool (talk) 07:58, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

According to this reference (in the expandable 'History' section), it was first (?) named thus by "Harris (1766)". This would be Moses Harris in his 1766 The Aurelian or natural history of English insects (67 years previously another writer had called it "Mr. Vernon's Small Fritillary"). However, no mention of the name's origin is given in the 1840 New Edition of Harris's work. As a former amateur lepidopterist I don't recall ever encountering an explanation. I had wondered if it was due to some fancied resemblance to the coat of arms of the Dukes of Burgundy, but there is no obvious correlation. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.123.24.56 (talk) 00:44, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hamearis lucina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100919143223/http://butterfly-conservation.org/uploads/Biodiversity%20priorities%20download%201.pdf to http://www.butterfly-conservation.org/uploads/Biodiversity%20priorities%20download%201.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100919025334/http://butterfly-conservation.org/uploads/bc0001%20Duke%20of%20Burgundy.pdf to http://www.butterfly-conservation.org/uploads/bc0001%20Duke%20of%20Burgundy.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)