Talk:Hamburg massacre
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI have restored the Harvard reference style, which is one of the three methods approved by Wikipedia. A previous editor, in an attempt to convert to footnotes, introduced inline {cite book} code that made the article difficult to edit.
I suspect there is a way to write footnotes so that article text remains fairly clean. In the meantime the article is referenced and is easy to both read and edit, and in my opinion should stay the way it is. To quote: "You should follow the style already established in an article, if it has one; where there is disagreement, the style or system used by the first editor to use one should be respected." Our time is better spent on insanely great content. Hughespj (talk) 12:06, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Image that may be useful
editEditors may find this image useful for this article. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hamburg massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141105180816/http://www.screconstruction.org/Reconstruction/Citations_files/GaryCampaign.pdf to http://www.screconstruction.org/Reconstruction/Citations_files/GaryCampaign.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
The death of Simon Coker was not in Hamburg, and probably not by Tillman
editRegarding "The Sweetwater Sabre Company, led by Ben Tillman, was chosen to execute black state legislator Simon Coker of Barnwell. After being told of his impending execution, Coker asked the unit to give instructions to his wife regarding cotton-ginning and that month's rent. He was then executed mid-prayer.": First off, While Wikipedia's Benjamin Tillman article has a mention of the Ellenton riots, also (I think accurately) referencing the Coker killing as happening there, Tillman himself, in his 1909 speech to a Red Shirts reunion, gives his own version which actually sounds even more detailed, in which Captain Nat Butler, during the Ellenton Riots, borrows two men from Tillman's unit to do the job. Anyone interested in fixing this (I guess by merely deleting the reference in this article) might want to double-check the text of Tillman's 1909 speech, "The Struggles of 1876: How South Carolina was delivered from Carpet-Bag and Negro Rule", Page 63. 76.236.220.28 (talk) 19:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Was this a "riot," as claimed in the lead?
editThis wasn't a spontaneous outbreak of violence by a crowd. It was planned and organized. They even had their red shirts as uniforms. It was a terrorist act. Referring to it as a riot is just an attempt to whitewash what actually occured.
Atlanta had a similar incident in the early 20th century, where white Atlantans killed a number of black Atlantans in the streets. It used to be referred to as the "Atlanta Race Riots," but that term is not often used now, because it implies that there were "rioters" on both sides, when in fact it was just a one-sided massacre.
Calling the Hamburg massacre a "riot" is like referring to the massacre of women and children at Wounded Knee as a "riot."
Can we please do away with this? Ormewood (talk) 17:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC)