Talk:Ham, London

Domesday Book

The 2007 Surrey Domesday Book reference supporting the claim that Ham is mentioned in the Domesday book is now dead. Both PASE and Open Domesday assert that Estreham relates to modern day Streatham, not Ham.

The cited Domesday entry; (Philmore reference 8,15) relating to Haimo's holdings (See PASE results for Streatham and Open Domesday (4th entry)) comes immediately after the entry for 'Patricesham' (Petersham) (See Surrey Page 6) so I too would have assumed that this relates to Ham. However, if I understand the Domesday Book article correctly (probably not!), the entries are not necessarily arranged geographically but by who held them.

None of the printed references I have to hand claim that Ham is mentioned in Domesday, but they all refer to the Petersham entry. I have therefore removed the claim that Ham was mentioned in Domesday until there is another reference out there to support it. --KenBailey (talk) 21:39, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ham, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150104172545/http://www.hprpc.co.uk/?page_id=2 to http://www.hprpc.co.uk/?page_id=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ham, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120113004947/http://www.richmond.gov.uk/str_ham___petersham.pdf to http://www.richmond.gov.uk/str_ham___petersham.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 3 December 2017 (UTC)