Talk:Halt and Catch Fire (computing)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Halt and Catch Fire (computing) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 356 days

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Anon./Unknown (1967). [Abbreviation appearance, article title unknown], Datamation (magazine), p. 116, 120, New York, NY, USA: Technical Publishing Company. This source mentions HCF, see [1].
Anon./Unknown (1968). [Abbreviation appearance, article title unknown], Modern Data Systems (journal), p. 136, Framingham, MA, USA: Delta Publications. This source mentions HCF, see [2].
Belzer, Boris (1971). The Architecture and Engineering of Digital Computer Complexes, Vol. 1, p. 85, New York, NY, USA: Plenum Publishers, OCLC 209102. This source mentions HCF and other commands, providing a further hidden citation, see [3].
Banks, Walter (2000). "Mailing list entry". Retrieved 2014-06-08.

Z80 halt

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm not really sure why the Zilog Z80 is mentioned here at all. As on the Intel 8080, what would be otherwise be a MOV M,M instruction is encoded as a HALT; the CPU stops until it gets interrupted. If, however, the program has disabled interrupts, obviously the CPU is going to stay halted -- unless it is sent a non-maskable interrupt, which both the 8080 and the Z80 provide. So in neither case does DI followed by HALT cause anything unusual; certainly not catching fire. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic