This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
What were the navigation boxes removed from this article? They seemed very relevant to this topic and seemed to be in the right places at the end of the article as per: Wikipedia:Navigation templates. Is there some way they should be done differently? Dan Conlin (talk) 21:22, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
The Navboxes don't navigate here. Metro Transit is the relevant linked article. Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Repeated edits that got this article semi-protectededit
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
After seeing a mention at AN/I, I took a look at the changes that have been edit-warred in and that are currently still in place after semi-protection (See WP:WRONGVERSION). A subheader, "Current service" or something like that, has been made into regular text. A huuuuuge table of bus routes has been inserted in that subsection, above the list of ships. I don't think that's relevant in the article on the ferry service, and I think I'm going to remove it and reinstate the presumably erroneously destroyed heading. On the other hand, the list of ships seems only to have been tweaked, so I think I'll leave that alone. But ... the list of ships duplicates in its notes information on their names that also appears in non-tabular form. The non-tabular version looks better to me, including not having URL-style links at the bottom to the relevant Wikipedia articles, and instead using wikilinks on the names concerned. I think the notes, or most of them, ought to be removed. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC) ... Hmm. It looks as though the huge table of bus routes and the heading mess-up have been removed already, leaving only the clumsy duplication in the notes about the ship names. Do others agree these are superfluous? Yngvadottir (talk) 18:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Yngvadottir: I recently opened a similar discussion on the talk page for Halifax Transit. This IP-hopping user has been adding strange hoax-like information to the Halifax Transit page for at least the past year, and seems to have come here after that page was protected. Regarding the ferry info – I agree that the notes should be trimmed and the information incorporated into the article body, as in older revisions. Ben MacLeod (talk) 00:59, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
