New editor

edit

I just signed on as a new editor to Wikipedia, and the prompt suggested I start by editing this article. I'm currently going through the text to fix capitalization and punctuation issues, but I'm not sure how to deal with the rest. I'd suggest reformatting the "Body of Work" section to a table, to more closely resemble the comparable sections of other directors and media producers. I'm not sure how to deal with the sourcing issues: the IMDB is fine, but several of the others set off warning flags (the first citation specifically, to 'RapAttacksLive' archived from 'Nasty News,' does not appear to be a reliable source).

The issue with sourcing may be part of a broader issue with Wikipedia:Notability. I'm not entirely persuaded this subject deserves its own Wikipedia entry, as much of the content seems to mirror the subject's IMDB page. This concern is reinforced by the warning at the top of the page that the article is written like an advertisement, or that (as far as I can tell) the subject of the article is the one who created it. PublicolaMinor (talk) 04:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Hi and welcome! I completely agree with your above analysis that this bio looks a bit "puffed up" and is of doubtful notability. I would like to add that IMDb is not considered to be a reliable source either. It's valuable, because it can point us to possible search terms and such, but it can be edited by its contributors without editorial control, so it is not an "RS". Perhaps the article should go to WP:AFD if no better sources can be found. --Randykitty (talk) 10:59, 26 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
    • Thanks for the welcome. I looked up the "Wikipedia: Guide to Deletion" and took a bit of time to do more research. Per the guide, I've added the WP:Note template to invite discussion, especially from the original creator. As far as I was able to determine, most of the sources linked by this page tend to focus on the particular works by the subject, and only briefly acknowledging the subject's involvement. There is one source that focuses on Hakeem Khaaliq directly, and that is Ebony magazine's review of "Quienes son los Afro-Mexicanos?" [1]. Per WP:Basic, I'm inclined to say that this subject lacks notability, and that if an article is deserved, it'd be better for it to focus on "Quienes" or one of Khaaliq's other works directly. Given that I'm a new editor and this is the first wikipage I'm involved in editing, I'm reluctant for my first major action to be requesting it for deletion. I'm going to leave the WP:Note template up for another few days and see if anyone else comments before I bring things over to WP:AfD PublicolaMinor (talk) 07:00, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Ebony: Culture Clash".
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hakeem Khaaliq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:51, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Reply