Talk:Haicheng, Liaoning

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 173.88.246.138 in topic Lack of information

Rename Haicheng, Liaoning to Haicheng.

edit

Haicheng, Liaoning is by far the primary topic WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Of the six contenders on the disambiguation page, only three have articles. Four are only minor townships in China. What links here gives 165 links for Haicheng, Liaoning. The aricle Haicheng, Ningxia has just 3 links and the article Haicheng District has 135. When searching on Google or Bing, they default to Haicheng, Liaoning. A bing search for Haicheng Beihai (Haicheng District) give 51,000 hits where as Haicheng, Liaoning gets 72,100 hits. Google books predominatly talks about Haicheng, Liaoning not the others. Historically Haicheng in Liaoning was a important city. Until just 50 years ago it was a prefecture level city, not county level. Significant historical events have happened there including the famous Haicheng earthquake and several notable people come from there. The other candidates for this name cannot claim that same. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:23, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Haicheng, Liaoning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lack of information

edit

After, what, 20 years of Wikipedia's existence, this article is pretty pathetic, providing virtually no meaningful information about this place with a population of over 1 million. Please expand. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 09:43, 7 November 2020 (UTC)Reply