This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spiders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spiders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpidersWikipedia:WikiProject SpidersTemplate:WikiProject SpidersSpiders articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
@DatGuy: I think AWB will classify an article as not a stub solely from number of links and length of article. The mistag here is entirely on us though, should have reviewed the edit -- samtartalk or stalk 18:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
@DatGuy and Samtar: AWB can only make decisions based on necessarily simplistic algorithms, so I don't regard it as a bug. All it's suggested edits need to be reviewed by the editors who use it. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Peter coxhead: I agree, however I believe that as long as there is a 'stub' quality level on the talk page, it shouldn't be changed on the article. Dat GuyTalkContribs 10:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Definitely the two need to be kept in sync. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
