Someone had put this in the article page, where it does not belong, I am copying it here. N.B. It is not my own opinion, just doing a service edit

[Hi. This church is an utmost important church in the history of early Christianity. It seems that this article has not quite been able to capture the importance of this church in the history of early Christianity. Reference to all academic work related to this church. It would be worth UNESCO to consider the inscription of this church as a UNESCO heritage site so that it might be preserved as a museum or as a historical site within all the rules and procedures applying to UNESCO heritage sites. The reference concerning November 2011 seems to be odd (a very recent change in a long history of an important religious site) and could possible be raised up in talks with the appropriate government.][The conversion into a museum in 1935 is more logical in light with the actions related to Hagia Sophia in Istanbul (secularization and opening as a museum)]. [Similar cultural preservation measures could be considered for other important historical religious sites (or areas) such as Ephesus (Artemis temple, Basilica of St. John and Church of Mary) and Antioch.] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.245.189.172 (talk) 22:30, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply