Untitled edit
Needs much NPOV work ("excellent" graphics and such might fit but only if supported by reviews and the like). Seraphimblade 07:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Expert review edit
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Closing review; sources have been found. --B. Wolterding 16:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
As part of the Notability wikiproject, I am trying to sort out whether this topic is notable enough to have its own article. The problem with the article is that it is completely unsourced, and so currently seems to fail the notability criteria. Basically, what I would like to know is:
- Do secondary sources (e.g. reviews in reliable publications) exist for this game, so that they can be added to the article; or
- do such sources not exist (then the article should be deleted).
Your opinions are welcome; please add your comments below. --B. Wolterding 13:00, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- There's a very disparaging review of it in the August 1987 Zzap!64 (link), which I eventually found in a very roundabout way. Nifboy 13:21, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- There, article should be fixed up now. Nifboy 13:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Also came out on spectrum see review, so added details. --Oscarthecat 15:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.