Redundant article edit

This article seems completely redundant with Planetary habitability . Can we merge or delete this? ----69.36.132.253 (talk) 21:27, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Agreed, this should probably be merged back into Planetary habitability. Similarly, Habitable exomoon should probably be merged into Habitability of natural satellites. After this though I don't really want to tag any more of this user's articles. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 00:36, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

I disagree, no merge needed imo. A habitable exoplanet is a type of planet, whereas planetary habitability is the measure of a planet's or a natural satellite's potential to develop and maintain environments hospitable to life Albertheditor (talk) 15:15, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Both articles are about the same thing - what conditions are necessary for a planet to be habitable. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 15:17, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:53, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Image removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albertheditor (talkcontribs) 23:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply