The contents of the Haberlea rhodopensis page were merged into Haberlea on 14 August 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments4 people in discussion
Merge - assuming @Plantdrew: is proposing this for monotypy. If so, it seems warranted. --awkwafaba (📥) 13:16, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes, monotypy is the reason. Plantdrew (talk) 17:11, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I agree with merging - another monotypic genus in the same family is Jerdonia, for which only the page Jerdonia indica exists. Note: If this Haberlea merge keeps only the name of the genus for the article title, perhaps the Jerdonia indica page should be renamed to maintain consistency. JonathanBeller (talk) 00:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
