Talk:Habeas data

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

I don't understand why this has been changed to Argentinian law. Habeas data is not a specific figure of Argentinian law. Eulen 20:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Title change edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article's title needs to be changed. Habeas Data is not only an Argentine phenomenon. --Anduin13 12:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)Anduin13Reply

Change in the order of adoption of Habeas Data in Latin-American Constitutions edit

Even though the cited source says that Colombia adopted Habeas Data in 1997, I know for a fact (I am a Colombian law student) that Colombia adopted it in 1991, before Paraguay's 1992 Constitution. So I changed the sentence which now says: "Following the Brazilian example, Colombia incorporated the Habeas Data right to its new Constitution in 1991. After that, many countries followed suit and adopted the new legal tool in their respective constitutions: Paraguay in 1992, Peru in 1993, Argentina in 1994, and Ecuador in 1996".

Add topic