The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion
I think the last sentence of the first paragraph of this page's "Editorial policy and viewpoints" needs an edit: "The Haaretz editorial line is supportive of weaker elements in Israeli society, such as sex workers, foreign laborers, Israeli Arabs, Ethiopian immigrants, and Russian immigrants."
The word "weaker", or the phrase "weaker elements", is too subjective—as well as inflammatory. Isn't it? Dsa605 (talk) 14:27, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Maybe they meant weaker like marginalized. If that is the case, an edit is still a good idea for greater clarity. Thanks. Dsa605 (talk) 14:28, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
The first is an opinion piece by Caroline Glick, an Israeli conservative. The second is an editorial by Ed Morrissey on Hot Air, a conservative political blog. (It does not appear on the WP:RS/PS list.)
Latest comment: 2 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Haaretz is by no means Israel's newspaper of record. Its viewership is less than 5%, and there are more than a couple newspapers who are faaaar more relevant to that claim. Let's not jump over our head, Haaretz in Hebrew is very, very, rarely read. Shovalis (talk) 22:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
The concept of "newspaper of record" has nothing to do with the size of the readership. Zerotalk 06:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
A 2011 Tablet article[1] is entitled Israel’s Paper of Record. Mcljlm (talk) 16:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
As to the last sentence on the first para ("It is known for its left-wing and liberal stances on domestic and foreign issues")edit
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As to the last sentence on the first para ("It is known for its left-wing and liberal stances on domestic and foreign issues"):I think that the word "liberal" should be removed for accuracy,and that the word "general" in between "its" and "left-wing" should be written in order to avoid incorrect inclusion (Sometimes right-wing or more "moderate" views are in place,at least until recently).