Talk:HMS Hope (1910)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 14:30, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

• Number of ships in the Acorn class only appears in the lead
  • Added with reference.
• "using oil enabled the design of a smaller vessel which increased weaponry" - this could use some elucidation, as a smaller vessel would not seem to be one that could have more weapons
  • Good spot. I have clarified it.
• "The greater deck space was used to mount a larger armament." - I thought the class was designed to be smaller?
  • It is both smaller and better armed. I hope that is clearer now.
• "but was paid off in 1919" - is there a link for "paid off"?
  • It does not link to a page, and I do not feel it is helpful. Maybe its a chance for a page to be written...
• Something is off with the licensing for File:Hope-1911.jpg - the author information says the author died in 1911 but the tag says the author died in 1920
  • True. There are a number of photos by the author, some with 1911 and others with 1920, so I feel it is unclear. I have replaced the image with one which has a CC license.
• Spot-checked a couple of the sources; no issues.

Hog Farm _Talk 00:27, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

@Hog Farm: Thank you for the review. I believe everything has been addressed. simongraham (talk) 23:23, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Passing for GA. I'm okay with the new lead image, but for anything higher than GA, you'd need to demonstrate why the underlying model is also PD or freely licensed. Hog Farm _Talk 16:36, 25 June 2022 (UTC)