Talk:HMS Hasty (H24)/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by SMasters in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 08:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    There were numerous punctuation issues but I have fixed them. Otherwise, the article is well written and complies to MOS requirements.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Article is properly referenced with reliable sources and has no original research.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Article covers all major aslects and is focused.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Article complies to WP:NPOV.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Article is stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Images are correctly tagged.
  7. Overall: Aside from some minor punctuation issues (if you can't read a whole sentence without running out of breath, you need a comma somewhere!), which I have fixed, the article complies to all the requirements for a GA, and I am happy to pass it. – SMasters (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Pass/Fail: