This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Gallant (H59) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | HMS Gallant (H59) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 25, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the British destroyer HMS Gallant (pictured) struck a mine on 10 January 1941 that blew the bow off the ship, and had to be towed stern-first to Malta by the destroyer HMS Mohawk? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Gallant (H59)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 00:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- prose: (MoS):
- prose: (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
-
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
edit1. complement was 137 officers and men in peacetime. Might be worth noting the additional men in wartime.
- Done.
2. Exclusive of government-furnished equipment like the armament. Do you mean Excluding?
- Done.
3. her sister Griffin. Suggest - her sister-ship Griffin
- Nope, already referred to her as sister ship earlier. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 00:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Nice Work, Passed. Thurgate (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)