Talk:HMS Concorde (1783)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: —Ed!^(talk) 22:44, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)

1. It is reasonably well written:

   Hold

   1. The lead needs to be reworked. Right now it consists of a small graph summarizing the article followed by a longer one summarizing the same thing. It should be 2 or 3 graphs and summarize the entire thing only once.
   2. French Career: The use of time is inconsistent (6 o'clock, 8pm, 1.15pm) and needs to be standardized. I would recommend using four-digit time which is easier to read. Adding the local time zone (or UTC time) would also be helpful.
   3. "after an hour and three quarters of fighting, forced her to surrender" — that sounds odd. Can you change it to "X minutes" instead?
   4. The 'Later years' section is very short. I would suggest either expanding it or merging it with another section.
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable:

   Pass no problems there.

3. It is broad in its coverage:

   Pass no problems there.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:

   Pass no problems there.

5. It is stable:

   Pass no problems there.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:

   On Hold For the images, would it be possible to point out exactly which of the ships is supposed to be Concorde?

   To answer that, while I have a decent idea of which ship might be which, I'm not positive, so I'm probably not the right person to be adding that in. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 18:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   On Hold while a few things are sorted out. —Ed!^(talk) 23:14, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Issues fixed. I can ask the MILHIST project if they're able to figure out how to distinguish the ships in the pictures. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 18:38, 23 October 2010 (UTC)