Talk:HMS Clyde (P257)

Picture

Added picture to improve article Bumpyrat (talk) 13:32, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Contradiction

I wonder if this article conflicts somewhat with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Clyde.

The HMS Clyde article reads "Ten ships of the Royal Navy have been named HMS Clyde", and goes on to enumerate the ten.

This article reads "HMS Clyde (P257) is the ninth ship in the Royal Navy to bear the name."

One of these statements is wrong, or at least sufficiently ambiguous/misleading as to deceive.

I suggest a change. But am not sure which requires changed!

Echo park00 (talk) 09:41, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

With nobody having done anything about this for over two years, I've simply made the change. Airdrake (talk) 17:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Peter Dunt

Peter Dunt is neither knighted nor retired. There is confusion here with his brother, Sir John Dunt. --Jamesedmo (talk) 09:23, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on HMS Clyde (P257). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060908195134/http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/server/show/ConWebDoc.6581 to http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/server/show/ConWebDoc.6581
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070926235436/http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/server/show/ConWebDoc.7883 to http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/server/show/ConWebDoc.7883

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

To be decommissioned after only 10 years?

The article suggests that the ship is set to be decomissioned after only 10 years of active service. This seems somewhat unusual? Is there a reason for this which should be included?146.199.239.229 (talk) 22:41, 21 November 2017 (UTC)