Talk:HMS Carlisle (D67)
 | A fact from HMS Carlisle (D67) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 September 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
Conflicting information edit
There appears to be some conflict in information between this Wiki and the one for the Nanjing incident. This one states that Carlisle was laid up for refit between 1921 and 1929, yet the other lists her among the Royal Navy flotilla participating in the aforementioned incident. Eight years does seem like a long time spent in refit. Could someone please verify those years? Thanks! Sector001 (talk) 15:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
AA conversion edit
Does anyone have a source that indicates the change in armaments of Carlisle as converted to an AA cruiser? It would be useful to update her info box since it is presently ambiguous whether the 4in were added or replaced the 6in - particularly as there were five 6in but eight 4in. I know that it was probably a replacement but neither the original nor the subsequent configuration is clear. Not my area and don't have access to sources easily. Regards. Cinderella157 (talk) 09:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Carlisle had her 6in, 3in and TTs removed during her conversion to an AA cruiser. Here's some online sources:CARLISLE light cruisers (1918-1922) and HMS CarlisleDamwiki1 (talk) 23:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright problem edit
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Jack Frost (talk) 05:08, 20 December 2020 (UTC)