Talk:HMS Amphion (1911)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
HMS Amphion (1911) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 13, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Amphion (1911) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |
A fact from HMS Amphion (1911) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 November 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Untitled
editThere is an inconsistency in the last paragraph. It mentions that few of the survivors of the German ship are rescued, 1 dies on the HMS Lark, and it ends with stating that all the German prisoners died. 195.0.2.193 (talk) 08:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- I noticed that too. In general, the numbers don't add up; and don't correspond with the sources. Here it says 150 men were lost, not 132. Also it says first 46 Germans rescued, later to refer to 19 of 21 Germans rescued. The numbers should be corrected, as this makes no sense. -Oreo Priest 11:25, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- The sources vary, nearly all give slightly different figures. If you can find a definitive answer please feel free to add it. Benea (talk) 11:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Amphion (1911)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 12:11, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Will review this one. Parsecboy (talk) 12:11, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Two dupe links.
- "Tragically" is probably not NPOV
- I might cut the link to worldwar1.co.uk - it doesn't add anything to the article, per the first bullet at WP:ELNO.
Not much to harp on, as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 12:20, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- I was wondering if anyone would catch that ;-) All done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)