Talk:HIV/GA2

GA Reassessment

This reassessment was terminated by me because it is not consistent with the intention of WP:GAR and did not follow appropriate procedures. This discussion is preserved only as a record of the actions that were taken. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC) Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Please see Talk:HIV#HIV_Risk_Table which, I think, is a major issue. Phoenix of9 06:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Also looking at HIV#Sexual, there seems to be strong heterosexism. Eg: Parts about circumcision ignore information such as this: [1] Phoenix of9 06:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

No problems with the table. Correctly cited with numbers that may be old, but are still best estimates. Heterosexism is your POV. That section is also written and cited correctly. --Bob (talk) 21:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

I've waited a few days but noone addressed my concerns. Bob, not only the numbers are old, but they are also contradicted by newer research. Phoenix of9 00:22, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Phoenix, as an uninvolved editor, but with a lot of experience at GA, this does not look like an appropriate course of action. Please see Wikipedia:Good article reassessment - it does not look like you have acted consistent with this process. Do not delist. This should either be a community GAR or a talk page issue (where I see the issues are being discussed). If you delist, I will immediately commence a process to reverse that action. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

I now see Phoenix has attempted to close this as a delist. These actions will be reverted. Phoenix, if you have an issue, discuss it at WP:GAR or on the project's talk page, where I have left a notice. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)