Literal meaning/Han Tu edit

Article needs literal meaning of this province name, and Han Tu. Badagnani 08:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I added a Etymology section in the end of the article, please share your opinion at WikiProject Vietnam. Grenouille vert (talk) 09:29, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

Hà Nam provinceHà Nam Province – Revert capitalization to pre-Kauffner status and current consensus. NVanMinh (talk) 17:53, 16 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:An Giang province which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:59, 17 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:An Giang Province which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hà Nam Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Writing style edit

This article is appalling. It appears to have been written by a Communist cadre with an iron rod stuck up his arse. There is absolutely no meaningful content on the page whatever, just vague generalisations that look like they have come out of a particularly uninformative annual report that was published merely for the sake of finding something, anything, to write. The whole article needs a complete rewrite, preferably containing some facts and information about the place. Skinsmoke (talk) 08:18, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:18, 8 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:55, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply