This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Please do not remove the deletion tag from the caption for Gymslip.jpg - it is considered vandalism. If the image is found to not violate copyright, the tag will be removed. Dbratton 10:40, 28 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
This article contains the phrase "eliminate any possibility of them becoming sexualised". But that is contradicted later by "schoolgirl uniform pornography" and "schoolgirls as sexual objects". Can somebody resolve this contradiction? bobblewik 15:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
It is not a contradiction . It is simply a misinterpritation of the wording. Originally and when worn by school girls as mandatory uniform, it's meant to increase the modesty of a girl, but the gymslip has also become a sexual object when used by the makers of pornography to depict a schoolgirl either being punished or to 'enhance' the uniform.--Lucy-marie 16:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
It's sexualised due to its association with schoolgirls, not with sportswomen. --Sam Blanning(talk) 17:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
