Talk:Gurney equations

Explosives Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Minor edits to Gurney page edit

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I added some clarification to the section on fragmenting vs non-fragmenting materials and added content to help the reader visualize why velocities on fragmenting materials are only about 80% of Gurney-predicted velocities. Also cleaned up some wording and punctuation. DoktorScience (talk) 03:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic