Talk:Gumby/Archive 1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by UrsaLinguaBWD in topic Intro
Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:Gumbo RGB.JPG

 

Image:Gumbo RGB.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

(Monty Python)

What about Gumbies from Monty Python??
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.12.8.58 (talk) 16:24, 18 August 2005

Picture is mislabeled

The picture of "early bendable" gumby and pokey is incorrect. These are not "early" models, nor are these particular ones in the picture the bendable ones. These are the small non-bendable rubber cast miniatures produced in the 80's and 90's that never had wires so they could bend. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.187.251.221 (talk) 01:20, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Italics?

Why is the article title italicized? It's about the character, not the show... --Golbez (talk) 13:36, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Intro

I added a little bit to the intro to beef it up since there was a tag saying it was too short. If someone thinks this is sufficient, please remove the tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UrsaLinguaBWD (talkcontribs) 03:15, 13 October 2011 (UTC)