Talk:Guilty pleasure

This article was nominated for deletion on February 2 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

References edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Allright, so to start with the first reference. It's a watchmojo video. I mean, what authority does watchmojo have? Not that we need any confirmation on this subject but I suggest we remove the reference because the reference has no value. The second reference leads to a non-existing page, the third could be good but I don't see why you would put it up there and the fourth reference is from "today".com.

And most of all; why would you put a reference on barely half of the things you listed? That's even more ridiculous. Ciao. BeefDaeRoastLXG ^praat 15:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

WTF? edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Can anyone supply any information as to how guilt comes into play here? 67.82.9.213 (talk) 22:37, 13 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Guilty that you could be devoting your time to something better?68.117.218.247 (talk) 15:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic