Wikipedia

Talk:Guilty Pleasure (Ashley Tisdale album)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Info ref edit

Please merge edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  • Could someone plz merge this with Guilty Pleasure (Ashley Tisdale album), Guilty Pleasure (Ashley Tisdale Album), and Guilty Pleasure (album) all together! Thanks 04:50, 27 March 2009 User:Astroman1234
I've put a request in at WP:RM to take care of the naming problem. In the future, please don't create articles under the wrong name when the conditions for creation are satisfied: just edit the redirected article. That causes a lot less trouble.—Kww(talk) 16:10, 27 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oops, sorry!

It's Alright, It's OK edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I think "It's Alright, It's OK" should get it's own page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.57.101 (talk) 22:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

When the single gets sufficient information, notable references, a music video released and charts anywhere, we can think to create a page for it. Decodet (talk) 00:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Repeat information edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The info repeat about the single, it's important, later when the single will be a charted single and get own page. Juanacho(talk) 19:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Something wrong edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The album doesn't come out in Mexico in April, this fact is FALSE. Sarah, the administrator from AshleyTisdale.com, confirmed it's false, the album doesn't come out in April anyway and anywhere!!! Please, someone take off this information, because when I took it off, someone replaces it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iceland-X (talk • contribs) 18:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

International Bonus Tracks edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why were the Japanese edition version bonus tracks removed from the track listing? They were cited. Skawt (talk) 11:49, 20 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's back again on the article. pedrojoão 14:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

If my Life was a Movie edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The leaked song, If my Life was a Movie, will be on Guilty Pleasure as bonus track on a special or standard edition of another country? pedrojoão 14:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

A rep for Warner Bros. said a while back on the Ashley Tisdale official message boards that it will probably be used as a bonus track. But no official word yet.67.169.148.40 (talk) 05:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Album cover getting mocked edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Many reviews are mocking the album cover[1] Nbeau1989 (talk) 22:30, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Many reviews? You only posted a single site, not a notable one. It also includes almost-pornographic photos. How could it be notable? Decodet (talk) 13:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ http://www.manhuntdaily.com/2009/04/ashley-tisdale-victim-of-terrible-graphic-design.html

Adding a professional review edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I have been trying to add a professional review from http://www.teentoday.co.uk/article/ashley-tisdale-guilty-pleasure/; however, user Nbeau1989 keeps deleting it with claims like 'not professional reviews done by gossip magazines and teenage publications are not un-bias' and 'barely known gossip magazine and has no credibility to it either'. Firstly, a quick perusal of the website shows it carries numerous other album reviews all written in a professional style with an editorially neutral point of view, and other reviews from the website are featured on Wikipedia album pages. Nbeau1989's claims that it is a 'gossip magazine' are untrue because teentoday.co.uk is not a gossip magazine, it is a legitimate website! The WikiPedia: WikiProject Albums page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Albums#Professional_reviews) states 'Professional reviews may include only reviews written by professional music journalists or DJs, or found within any online or print publication having a (paid or volunteer) editorial and writing staff (which excludes personal blogs)' and I think the teentoday.co.uk review complies with this. The WikiProject Albums article also states that articles should have ten reviews - and given that there are thus far relatively few reviews for this album, and the majority of them are negative, I think that the teentoday.co.uk review provides a nice balance, as well as making the article more exhaustive and supporting the article's statement that reviews have been 'mixed' - some have been negative, but others have been positive. Checking Nbeau1989's editing history, it appears his main reason for deleting the review is because it is a positive review of Tisdale and all his edits have been to include negative information. What does everyone else think? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.78.48.24 (talk) 04:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • I read your claims and I think this review should be added to the article. Decodet (talk) 04:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Can i ask why when we already have nearly 6! reviews and teentoday is not even that well known it does not have it's own page to link to on wikipedia and me deleting it was not personal vendetta against anyone or anything i just personaly DONT think it should be in there do you really want to add every single review written about this album to be placed there even ones from lil blog's that dont even have a page on here or would you rather have pages where people can RELATE to and know that it is a trusted review Nbeau1989 (talk) 02:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

What If - own page? edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm curious to know why "What If" doesn't have it's own page and "Overrated" does. Is there a difference in criteria between the two? 67.169.148.40 (talk) 00:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just created one. Decodet (talk) 03:06, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Masquerade and Hot Mess Please?! edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I think Masquerade and Hot Mess needs to have a page here in Wikipedia cause many people including me are searching and what's to find out... so please..! 67.169.148.40 (talk) 19:05, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

They can't just get their own pages. I personally think that in order to get its own page, a song needs to have charted somewhere, and neither of these songs have yet.Akcvtt (talk) 23:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

i agree both songs should not get there own page unless they chart on numrous charts around the world rather then any single specific one Nbeau1989 (talk) 07:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Second single edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The admin of Ashley Tisdale's official boards - managed by Warner Bros. Records - has posted that "Crank It Up" is the official second single and "Masquerade" will be a promotional single, to be released before "Crank It Up". Warner has not posted anything on Tisdale's website but I managed to create a account on Tisdale's forum and I can tell you that's correct. But since it has been confirmed and there's no other reliable source, I think the link to the official board should be used until a new reference becomes available. Other opinions? Decodet (talk) 18:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

If they won't post it in a more official place than a forum, it can't be treated as confirmed.—Kww(talk) 18:49, 23 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Masquerade single edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Masquerade promo single is on Spotify, but all the other promo singles aren't. So, Is Masquerade an official single??--84.77.129.250 (talk) 14:41, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Release edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The release section is in desperate need of a cleanup ! 11coolguy12 (talk) 11:34, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Countdown edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

]This article didn't specify about the iTunes Countdown that was released during the album's promotion. I searched for sources but all I could find was this link (which doesn't work anymore) and other forums and blogs but those aren't considered as reliable sources by Wikipedia standards.

I want to ask you guys to find a reliable source that justifies this. I can't find a reliable site that specifies this anymore. Please? Pedro João [talk] 20:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Guilty Pleasure (Ashley Tisdale album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Guilty Pleasure (Ashley Tisdale album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Guilty_Pleasure_(Ashley_Tisdale_album)&oldid=1202498160"