Talk:Guided-missile destroyer
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Guided-missile destroyer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comments
editWhy are half these names in ALL-CAPS? Evercat 02:41, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)
The following remark was hidden in an HTML comment. I'm moving it here to make it more visible:
- "lots of these are conversions or just plain designator changes e.g. Luce. I'm looking for additional information and will update. Feel free to add. StinKerr"
French frigates on list
editWhy are FS Forbin (D620) and FS Chevalier Paul (D621) losted as DDG? Both are frigates as stated by the French government. I will remove for now assuming this is an error. G. R. Allison (talk) 07:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- They are not. For the French there are two types of frigates. One is the First class given the pennant D (Destroyer) and the other the second rank or ordinary frigates with pennant starting with F (Frigate).Bcs09 (talk) 18:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
DD listed as DDG
editi've deelted the Spruances they are not DDG, afaik are GM only ship with medium/long range SAM, the other type of missiles don't qualifies. for same i deleted the soviet Kildin class. also most of chinese ships are not qualifyed i not deleted this for now waitng comments — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.239.221.2 (talk) 17:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- It's likely that someone assumed that the ships refitted with VLS were capable of launching Standard ER. However, Conway's indicates this refit was only for Tomahawk and ASROC. In any case, none were reclassified. RobDuch (talk) 02:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- agree only medium/long range SAM qualify; Francomemoria (talk) 09:24, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Guided missile destroyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150722212921/http://www.freepressjournal.in/indigenously-built-warship-ready-for-launch/ to http://www.freepressjournal.in/indigenously-built-warship-ready-for-launch/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
definition
editi added anti-aircraft but this is not enough a DDG is designed for area air defense not only self defense i take out some classes that are not DDG Francomemoria (talk) 18:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
i want writing some on the definition, i'm sorry for my english, the DDG is a USN ship classification, the G was/is used only for ships with the 3 T missiles (Talos, Terrier and Tartar) and for ships with the Standard Missiles, so for ships with area air defence missiles; we can for similarity classified as G ships that of the Nato and other US allies with the same missiles, we can also classified as G ships that with others western area air defence missile with comparable performances and dimensions like the Seaslug, Sea Dart, Masurca, Aster-30; i've some doubt that we can so classified ships with different missiles Francomemoria (talk) 17:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)