Talk:Guardians of the Galaxy – Mission: Breakout!

Discussion: keep or delete infobox concept art?

Hello - there is a difference of opinion on whether to include or exclude the infobox concept art for this planned attraction's article.

My own preference is to include it, as it is called out as concept art, and I believe most readers will derive more cognitive value from the article with the concept art included. Other editors' feedback would be much appreciated. Thanks. ‑‑Dstone66 ⑆^(talk)⑇^(contribs)⑈ 18:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

I see no harm in keeping it. It's clearly labeled "concept art" it lets readers know what the structure is planned to look like.Wikicontributor12 (talk) 23:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

It seems pretty obvious to me to keep it. It is the only way to display a graphic of the ride at the moment. Elisfkc (talk) 23:35, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

It would be okay to keep it for now, However. I don't think it should the the actual ride image as it is temporary and is subject to change. When The ride opens, then we can add the real image in its display box for the page. Marth The Hero King (talk) 14:55, 13 October 2016 (UTC) Marth The Hero King

When the ride opens, the concept art's license will expire, per the note in the license "As soon as construction is completed on the building, this image should be deleted and replaced with a freely licensed photograph of the actual building." Elisfkc (talk) 16:30, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Discussion: Should we include the outrage in the Disney community?

Greetings, It has come to my attention that many people believe we should include the outrage in the Disney community. I am not sure if we should include this as it may spread a negative reputation towards Disney which we do not want. So what should we do with the matter? Marth The Hero King (talk) 14:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Marth The Hero King.

Already discussed, see Talk:The Twilight Zone Tower of Terror/Archive 1#Social media note. Elisfkc (talk) 00:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikpedia does not concern itself with company's negative reputations (see WP:NPOV). I've opened a discussion at Talk:The Twilight Zone Tower of Terror#New York Times based on new information. James (^talk/_contribs) 16:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Alright, Thank you for informing meMarth The Hero King (talk) 15:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Marth The Hero King

Thank you for telling me. It this is purely legal or website policy we should abide by it, but if it isn't I believe we should include it. This project has had an enormous amount of criticism and for good reasons.

Please see this link: http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2016/10/18/tower-of-terror-devotees-protest-disneylands-plans-to-change-ride/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by David2319 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

@David2319: Please see the last responses in this discussion; Talk:The Twilight Zone Tower of Terror#New York Times. As it currently stands, the agreement is that it is not notable because it is not out of the ordinary. There is always a huge negative outcry on social media every time that Disney parks announces a change or replacement. As a result, it is irrelevant to the article. Wikicontributor12 (talk) 03:47, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

...@David2319: One more thing; It should also be noted that your additions to the page were not written in a neutral tone. You put your own personal thoughts into the article. The personal opinions of editors do not belong in Wikipedia articles. Wikicontributor12 (talk) 06:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Recent revert

What is this all about? [1]. I fail to see how there is anything wrong with this edit and I am honestly baffled by the revert. All I did was state was occurs visually in this scenario with better accuracy. I did not add my own personal synthesis to this article whatsoever (as the message stated on my talk page [2]) This is not my interpretation of the scenario, it is what objectively occurs. I feel this should be discussed. @Marth The Hero King @Elisfkc Thank you for your time. Wikicontributor12 (talk) 05:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

@Wikicontributor12: I don't understand it either, which is why I didn't get into. Having not been on the ride, I don't know exactly what happens. However, from how I read it, both seem to describe the same thing. --Elisfkc (talk) 17:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. As I said, I was just being more accurate with the description, because there were some inaccuracies and I was only making some minor adjustments. I have no idea what that revert edit summary means in the slightest. Wikicontributor12 (talk) 17:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

On my talk page Marth The Hero King informed me that it was just a misunderstanding. So the issue has been resolved. Wikicontributor12 (talk) 01:02, 16 February 2018 (UTC)