This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Is Guang really a correct or widespread spelling? The Mandarin (Pinyin) and Cantonese romanizations are gong and gwang. --JWB (talk) 17:07, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm not sure, i thought guang might be the english for gong, so i changed the title. But now i have a doubt : is there two different things, one called Guang, and one called Gong?
The photo on the article is a Gong, and the description of Gong match here and on source
This source : [4] and [5](no legs) , describe Gong as follow :
Gong is a kind of wine vessel and this one's shape is a hybrid of many different animals. Its cover is adorned with the head of an imaginary animal with rabbit ears and giraffe horns, with a small dragon in high relief as its chine. The back of the cover is in ox-head shape, corresponding to the ox-head-shaped handle. Its belly is embellished with big phoenix patterns and its ring foot with phoenix-claw patterns.
In such a case, than maybe the slitly different shapes of [6] (no legs, no lid) and [7] (no legs, no circle handle) would be included in this description.