Talk:Guam at the 1988 Winter Olympics

Latest comment: 5 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

Discussion edit

How do you vote to delete a page that isn't worth it?

First, you must add the template CfD (surrounded by the usual double {{}}), then say why on the talk page (here). However, this page is worth it. If you want to get rid of it because it is a stub, then get to adding those templates, as there are a quite a few stubs on Wikipedia. Geo 21:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guam at the 1988 Winter Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Guam at the 1988 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 16:35, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Will review this article. MWright96 (talk) 16:35, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  


Infobox edit

  • Wikilink Guam National Olympic Committee
  • Add Judd Bankert as the flag bearer in the infobox

Background edit

  • Wikilink Winter Olympic Games to "winter version of the Games"

Biathlon edit

  • Wikilink hip fracture
  • Maybe add "scope=col" in the columns of the data table per MOS:DTT?

That's all from me in this review. MWright96 (talk) 18:07, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply