Talk:Groupama

NPOV? Not really.

Almost half the text of this article is related to a fire-and-brimstone rant by the tiny maker of software who alleges piracy of his works, without any independant citation. His software product company website contains all these allegations in PDF form:

http://www.twd-industries.com/archives/groupama_exposed.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.49.111.140 (talk) 14:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

The original article (and web site of the victim http://twd-industries.com/archives/) present the facts that you claim never existed. Please stop the blattant censoring: obviously GROUPAMA would have sued if these claims were just libel.83.77.94.151 (talk) 15:48, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Blattant Censorship

You deny official documents issued by French Police and French Dept. of Justice (the General Prosecutor of Paris) to be "independant citations". The software publisher you are referring to is only making those documents available. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.62.156.72 (talk) 08:18, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

(1) If no prosecution took place, a Wikipedia article can't allege that the bank was caught in piracy. (2) The maxim "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" applies here. The letter from the prosecutor declines to prosecute. The other documents in the bundle are unofficial. (3) If reliable sources repeat the allegation, then ask us again. Meanwhile such claims are totally unacceptable according to Wikipedia's community standards. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 14:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to contradict you but the French law states that any seized party reffusing to let a bailiff make the necessary investigations ORDERED BY A JUDGE (it was the case), is automatically considered as GUILTY.83.77.94.151 (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

You are edit warring again. You rightly point out that I don't know French law. If GROUPAMA is automatically considered guilty, where is the court finding of copyright infringement, or court order to pay compensation to twd-industries? Where is the press report?

The Wikipedia notion of reliable sources is not a simple matter of truth and falsehood. Whether you agree with that or not, it is not a policy a single person can overturn.

--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 21:47, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Groupama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080914081832/http://global300.coop/ to http://www.global300.coop/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)