Talk:Group homomorphism

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Shiyu Ji in topic Define "H is homomorphic to G"

Picture edit

 

Let me know how I can tweak this picture so it fits with the article's style--Cronholm144 09:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I guess ver.2 being in the article proves that it fits the style. ^^ -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 11:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Homomorphisms of abelian groups edit

I think that Hom(G,A) becomes an abelian group when A is abelian and G may be any group. It might be worth changing that section to mention this.

Relationship between bijection and isomorphism edit

There's a slight divergence of the definition of isomorphism between this article and group isomorphism. That article defines a g. isom. as "a bijective group homomorphism". Therefore it would seem that there's no need for one to "show that its inverse is also a group homomorphism", as this article mentions in its "Types of homomorphic maps" section. -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 11:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Define "H is homomorphic to G" edit

It would be useful to define the relation "H is homorphic to G" and say whether this means that there is a homomorphism from H to G or whether it means there is a homomorphism from G to H.

Tashiro (talk) 07:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I never heard such a term. Can you cite some source? --Shiyu Ji (talk) 20:49, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merge with Homomorphism? edit

It seems like a lot of the content on this page is similar too, or duplicated from, the generic wiki page on Homomorphism. Should we merge them? Make this a section on the Homomorphism page?

At the very least we should probably link to the main Homomorphism article *somewhere* on this page.

Crazy2be (talk) 01:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

I would not merge the two articles, homomorphisms are just morphisms in some category. Group homomorphisms are so much more special. But linking the articles is a good idea, go ahead! Jakob.scholbach (talk) 15:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Section Image and kernel: on the notation of multiplication in the group G edit

It looks strange to me that in the section Image and kernel, the multiplication on G is denoted as  , which usually denotes composition. The other sections all use * to denote multiplication on G. --Shiyu Ji (talk) 20:23, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply