| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Grob G 120 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Naming edit
I think you'll find that Grob do not use a dash or hyphen. the article should revert to Grob G 120 or Grob G120Petebutt (talk) 21:36, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Merger proposal edit
I propose that these be merged and that the resulting article be re-named Grob G 120 or Grob G120 as the current title is incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petebutt (talk • contribs)
- I agree they should be merged, they are just engine variants. Also you are right on the article name, the company calls it the G 120A and G120TP, so the article should be moved to Grob G 120. - Ahunt (talk) 01:05, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support - they should probably be merged, they are the same aircraft with an update. There's no substancial changes or detail to warrent a seperate article. Kyteto (talk) 23:27, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Grob G 120. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718042755/http://wwwapps2.tc.gc.ca/Saf-Sec-Sur/2/ccarcs/aspscripts/en/quicksearch.asp to http://wwwapps2.tc.gc.ca/Saf-Sec-Sur/2/ccarcs/aspscripts/en/quicksearch.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
The help request has been answered. To reactivate, replace "helped" with your help request.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:40, 25 March 2017 (UTC)