Talk:Grigori Perelman

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Gumshoe2 in topic Some modifications
Former good article nomineeGrigori Perelman was a Mathematics good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 14, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed


edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Grigori Perelman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Grigori Perelman

edit

We need more reference on Grigori Perelman — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.231.107.182 (talk) 14:44, 17 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Possibly give us more detail as to what you want.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.118.198 (talk) 03:09, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Grigori Perelman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:23, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Soul conjecture

edit

Apparently, Grigori Perelman achieved a breakthrough with the soul conjecture. After reading the section on it, I am none the wiser. It would be great if some wikipedians understanding what Perelman's contribution was could provide a bit of background, and explain what exactly Perelman did. At least enough so that people interested can start to did. As it is, I do not think anyone except people working in the super narrow field at a research level can get anything. Nicolas Le Novère (talk) 22:11, 8 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

None of this is arcane or overspecialized. Differential geometry is a standard part of the college-level undergraduate curriculum for mathematics degrees; the problem at hand being one of a series of partial results seeking to classify objects of a given type (here: manifolds and, more specifically, Riemannian manifolds). Wouldn't you be seeking answers yourself by simply doing research on the matter (e.g. applications or or motivations for the Soul Theorem, classification of (Riemannian) manifolds, classification of compact manifolds, etc.) and adding the extra information you think is needed to the article in question (soul conjecture), if you were truly curious? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:a000:1401:8806:222:69ff:fe4c:408b (talk) 08:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Some modifications

edit

I added some material on Perelman's work in the 90s, particularly on Alexandrov spaces, since I believe it has been more important than his proof of the soul conjecture. I've also significantly edited the section on verification, and I tried very hard to make it neutral. I've included quotes from Kleiner-Lott and Cao-Zhu which clarify the nature of Perelman's papers and why the expositions are so important. Previous versions of the page take a seemingly very moralistic viewpoint towards Cao and Zhu, which I don't think is appropriate. I've tried to include all viewpoints in a neutral way. In particular I included a somewhat long but extremely qualified quote from Yau, which I think represents very clearly the "dissenting" viewoint. I think it is clearly appropriate for inclusion, especially given that I explicitly framed it as a minority view and even followed it by a high laudation from Donaldson.

Gumshoe2 (talk) 04:59, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Useful addition to article

edit

The article would benefit from the inclusion of a timeline, describing which institutions Perelman has been affiliated with and during which years.