Talk:Grey columns

Student peer reviews

1. Quality of the information: 2
   Good time range of sources
2. Article size: 2
   (15,334 bytes)
3. Readability: 1
   More links would be helpful, some sentence structures could be improved for clarity but overall good "
4. References: 2
   More citations in the Role in Pain System and Lateral Grey Column sections would be helpful.
5. Links: 2
   Could add more but sufficient linking and a red link Haptic" and "nociceptive" can be linked. "Analgesics" can also be linked.
6. Responsive to Comments: 2
   no comments so no need for response
7. Formatting: 2
   Formatting is a little confusing more of an intro about the three separate types may help to orient the reader. Pictures/diagrams would be extremely helpful
8. Writing: 1
   Capitalize Laminae in the sentence "laminae III and IV....". The article switches between the European spelling "grey" and the American spelling "gray".
9. Used Real Name: 2
10. Is Outstanding in some way: 1
    Good article but not outstanding

Total: 17/20
Jsiemer3 (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback Jessica. I standardized the page to only use one spelling of "grey". I will also add those links you suggested. Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

---

1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 1
   Strong use of hyperlinks, but wording is sometimes confusing and article may not be understood completely by the average reader.
4. Refs: 2
5. Links: 2
   Strong use of links to other Wikipedia articles throughout.
6. Responsive to comments: 2
   No comments
7. Formatting: 2
   Good organization of sub-sections.
8. Writing: 2
   Some awkward sentence structure, but overall the article is well written and consistent.
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?: 1
    Only slightly over 15,000 Bytes and only obvious portions of the topic are discussed. Also, there are no figures or pictures to increase understanding.

Total: 18 out of 20
Ryandrsmith (talk) 15:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

I will work on restructuring some of the sentences. Thanks for the feedback. Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

I added a picture as you suggested. Thanks. Bsridhar6 (talk) 02:33, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

---

1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 2
   I have had no particular problem with readability.
4. Refs: 2
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2
   No comments so far
7. Formatting: 2
   Well-organized (anterior vs posterior vs lateral)
8. Writing: 2
   Consistent and writing style
9. Used real name: 2
10. Outstanding?: 1
    A lot of information covered, but depth seems lacking a little bit

Total: 19 out of 20
JinYongSim (talk) 17:45, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback.Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

---

My name is Balaji Sridhar and I have spent the past months working on a new, detailed gray column page which has just been added. Bsridhar6 (talk) 21:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Section headers

Students: please note that the headers (titles) of each section are incorrectly capitalized, per MOS:CAPS. Please fix it. --Tryptofish (talk) 00:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback and link to the MOS, Tryptofish. I changed the sections headers to sentence case as listed in the link you provided. Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Spinal cord horn

A small stub all of which covered in Grey column and in more detail Iztwoz (talk) 14:44, 2 October 2014 (UTC)  Done

Proposed merge of Posterior grey column into Grey column

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge into this article.Turtletwo (talk) 22:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

---

Much better coverage on target page Iztwoz (talk) 19:05, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposed merge of Anterior grey column into Grey column

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge into this article.Turtletwo (talk) 22:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

---

Much better coverage on target page Iztwoz (talk) 19:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

'''Support'''. Very confusing to have these stubs separately. Logically easier to have them in one place, and also easier for readers, editors, and wikignomes. Tom (LT) (talk) 03:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.