Talk:Grey-zone (international relations)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Mathglot in topic Date of coinage or popularization
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Proposed merge of No war, no peace into Grey-zone (international relations)
edit"No war, no peace" should be merged with "Grey-zone (international relations)" as it is the same concept, rather, "No war, no peace" is a subset of "Grey-zone". DTM (talk) 11:15, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose, they appear to be distinct concepts. I’ve never seen "No war, no peace” referred to as a subset of the grey-zone, if you have sources which say that this would be the time to present them. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 14:09, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 21:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Date of coinage or popularization
editSomething about when the term was first used, or first became popular or widespread, would be useful for the article. Did it happen from a single influential paper, in the way Hoffman popularized hybrid warfare in 2009? Or was it a more organic development that came up from the national security grassroots, and bubbled up to the surface? Mathglot (talk) 21:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)