Talk:Grey-headed flying fox

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Grey-headed flying fox/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I have classed this article as B owing to the fairly large amount of information in it which is all quite informative. However, this article definitely needs to be divided into subheadings and also needs to have all instances of "grey-headed flying fox" capitalised. Frickeg 05:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Substituted at 18:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grey-headed flying fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071124073636/http://www.zoo.cam.ac.uk/zoostaff/bbe/Welbergen/Megachiroptera.htm to http://www.zoo.cam.ac.uk/zoostaff/BBE/Welbergen/Megachiroptera.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Adults have an average wingspan up to 1 m (3.3 ft)... [an average up to is confusing - doesn't make sense

Adults have an average wingspan up to 1 m (3.3 ft) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.76.237.57 (talk) 11:03, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grey-headed flying fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071124073627/http://www.zoo.cam.ac.uk/zoostaff/bbe/Welbergen/GHFlyingFox.htm to http://www.zoo.cam.ac.uk/zoostaff/BBE/Welbergen/GHFlyingFox.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

What does this sentence mean?

This is the last sentence in the "Threats" section:

"The impact of indiscriminate shooting of bats has resulted in the species being declared vulnerable to extinction, to the tree species that relied on them for regeneration, the subsequent alteration to the forest ecology of the eastern states"

It doesn't parse, and what about the tree species that relied on them? I guess those trees died off?

Also, a general observation: This article is full of comma splices and subject-verb disagreements. I've fixed several, but I'm unlikely to take the time to find them all. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Need to update the distribution map

The distribution map should be updated to show Adelaide as the western-most part of their range. They setup camp in Adelaide in 2010, and have been there ever since. DONE NOW. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hefree2 (talk • contribs) 13:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Leucism in bats

Can we mention Tal'ngai Dha'run in this article? He has since passed away. Or should we just mention that leucism has been found in bats and post an image of him? There has been other species of bats that have shown leucism, a different genetic condition than albinism. Tal'ngai Dha'run was a grey-headed leucistic flying fox. He became pretty popular:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-01-10/rare-white-flying-fox-rescued-in-south-east-queensland/8171898

Battykin (talk) 18:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Battykin, I'd be pretty surprised if any images of him were compatible with Wikipedia's licensing requirements, but I haven't checked. It might be undue weight/out of scope to mention that at least one leucistic individual has been documented. Ideally we'd have more broad coverage about all types of pigment disorders, the rate of pigment disorders...I don't think the information is there to add encyclopedic coverage of pigmentation disorders in this species. Enwebb (talk) 18:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Enwebb Okay, I understand. I just thought since he made the "news" as being a rare find in this particular species, it might be worth a mention, but if it's not enough to be mentioned, then I understand. Thanks for the reply! Battykin (talk) 19:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomadic?

"One grey-headed flying fox was tracked travelling 12,337 kilometres in a criss-cross pattern between Melbourne and central Queensland, according to a new study that challenges a conventional belief that flying foxes remain in one local roost." per

References