Talk:Grenoble School of Management
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 18 October 2012, it was proposed that this article be moved to Grenoble Ecole de Management. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Multiple issues and promo on this page edit
A little context after adding back the issues templates ontop of the page. This entry has been targeted by, alledgedly, the comm team of the school (or possibly the institution representing the school) for many years now. I say alledgedly because the many warnings I posted on talk pages have never ever received any answer, not on en.wp, not on other Wikimedia projects. Yes, this is a cross-wiki issue, and en.wp is the most problematic alongside fr.wp. This is comming from 2A01:CB00:75A:E600:D56C:FB0D:EA00:68C3/64 (talk · contribs), and the IP changes everytime I post a warning on the talk-page.
At least since 2020, this IP is adding details that are not encyclopedic, and use primary sources to back them up. This results in a page that looks like a booklet for the school and not so much as an encyclopedic entry. Not to mention removing sourced content for greenwashing.
IMO, we should blow it up and start over. Gyrostat (talk) 08:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Really reads like an advert edit
I agree that this page reads like an advert. I don't think it is acceptable to remove the controversy related to this school about the criticism concerning greenwashing. This is not ok... 2001:861:5D51:4C0:5061:CC12:3BAC:4911 (talk) 23:47, 10 January 2023 (UTC)