Talk:Greenland and the European Union

Untitled

I do not think that this article should be merged with Greenland. I believe this can be added on to. Also, this article was looking for specific information. Green caterpillar 19:48, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm also against the merger; there is a lot to write about this topic. —Nightstallion (?) 12:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Fact error?

"Greenlandic citizens have EU citizenship, but cannot vote in EU affairs."

Is there really such a thing as a "Greenlandic citizenship"? Aren't the Greenlandic people Danish citizens, and the non-voting rule applied to Danish citizens residing in either Greenland or the Faroe Island? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.188.97.134 (talk) 09:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC). (58.188.97.134 09:10, 14 January 2007 (UTC))

Jyllands-Posten

According to Enlargement of the European Union#Greenland: 'There has been some speculation as to whether Greenland may consider rejoining the European Union. On 4th January 2007 the Danish daily Jyllands-Posten quoted the former Danish minister for Greenland, Tom Hoyem, as saying "I would not be surprised if Greenland again becomes a member of the EU...The EU needs the Arctic window and Greenland cannot alone manage the gigantic Arctic possibilities"'

However, that information isn't mentioned here. It could definitely be incorporated in this page's article text. (58.188.97.134 09:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC))

Greenland update, maybe worth mentioning

In a November 2008 referendum, Greenlandic people voted to further loosen tights with Denmark, seeking for more self-government. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 11:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Georgia (country)–European Union relations which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:00, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Georgia–European Union relations which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:45, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Argentinian province is not part of the European Union

The lead map "Indicating locations of European Union and Greenland" seems to show Argentina's Tierra del Fuego Province as part of the European Union. The Falkland Islands may be disputed, this area is not. The map's creator, User:Phoenix500, was a sock puppet of User:Phoenix B 1of3 who left Wikipedia in June 2012. More criticism here, which may require additional changes, possibly to additional maps. Anyone want to fix this? --96.237.209.19 (talk) 23:15, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

I replaced it with File:European Union Greenland Locator.svg which is probably more helpful anyways because if focuses on the european portion of the EU. TDL (talk) 23:28, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Greenland–European Union relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080120191436/http://euobserver.com:80/844/23194?rss_rk=1 to http://euobserver.com/844/23194?rss_rk=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:22, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greenland–European Union relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110119211257/http://cphpost.dk/news/international/89-international/45592-arctic-communities-angered-by-eu-seal-product-ban.html to http://www.cphpost.dk/news/international/89-international/45592-arctic-communities-angered-by-eu-seal-product-ban.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

OCT status and fishing agreement

The end of the paragraph talks about the agreement being struck down by the European Court of Auditors. Looking at the source article, this happened in 2006 (I think we should add the date) but I see that there is still an ongoing agreement. So I think that this part requires a follow up and/or a modification. (Was that decision reversed ? Ignored ? Was a new deal made and when...) I'll leave that to people more knowledgeable than me. 85.91.186.118 (talk) 11:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)