Talk:Green Versace dress of Jennifer Lopez/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

I'll leave down some comments when I get a stable internet connection - give it a couple of days! Thanks, ☠ Jaguar ☠ 21:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Going to do this review while I have stable internet connection! ☠ Jaguar ☠ 15:03, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Initial comments

Date formats

This isn't a problem that's going to affect GA, but it might be something worth checking. In the lead the date format of "February 23, 2000" is Month/Day/Year (American format) and in the body of the article "The designer herself also wore it to a Met Gala on 6 December 1999" it is Day/Month/Year (British format). Just wondering which one you would prefer?

Lead

• Don't see any problems here; the lead complies per WP:LEAD and meets the GA criteria

Background

• "...was also featured in the main campaign of the fashion house that year" - forgive my misunderstandings, what is fashion house referring to?

Reply: The house of Versace; the fashion label. Mabalu (talk) 16:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Reception

Really can't find any problems here. The prose is in good standing and meets the GA criteria.

References

All the references are working and the citations are in their correct places, complying per the GA criteria.

Close - promoted

The article fully meets the GA criteria, it is comprehensive, stable, well-written and all the references meet the GA criteria. Honestly can't find any other problems with it, despite my little knowledge on fashion I can say that from a reader's (and reviewer's) point of view that this article should pass the GAN. The date formats also shouldn't affect the GAN. @Dr. Blofeld: well done on another GA! ☠ Jaguar ☠ 15:03, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

@Jaguar: and @Mabalu:. Thanks both for doing this!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)