Talk:Greek austerity packages

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Mauro Mello in topic Urgent Review to Improve Neutrality

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because work on the article is underway. Given that the article technically has only been created a few minutes ago and given the edit summary clearly stating that this is a split, this is an invalid request. --PanchoS (talk) 16:17, 30 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Austerity Packages of Greece. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Greek austerity packages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Urgent Review to Improve Neutrality

edit

This article repeatedly shows political bias in relation to the subject, clearly below Wikipedia's standard for neutrality. An urgent review/editing by a neutral contributor is required, to clean up political biased text and assert objectivity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mauro Mello (talkcontribs) 14:48, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

There is a saying in WP - if you see a problem, fix it! Please feel free to make the article more neutral if you feel there is a problem. However, if you swing the article the other way and make it biased in the other direction, that will not help anything and you may be reverted. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 14:51, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
ᐐT₳LKᐬ, I can make a clean up of the blatant biased language but I don't have the knowledge to correct the bias in the content. That would require someone familiar with the matter. Even the language clean up would be easier for someone closer to the subject – for instance: what was the official name of the tripartite committee that the page currently refers to (derogatorily) as "the Troika"? I will research it but it is certainly common knowledge by people closer to the subject. I can certainly use a help on this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mauro Mello (talkcontribs) 19:37, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply