Talk:Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2018/GA2

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Golden (talk · contribs) 20:09, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this article. — Golden call me maybe? 20:09, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed
  • Decent article, but has some issues with MOS and sourcing which could be fixed:
  • Link Oniro mou at first mention in lead and article body
  • Remove "|url-status=live" values from references that aren't dead.
  • Do you have a source for "A submission period was opened beginning 4 October 2017, where record labels were able to submit their proposed artists and composers until 20 October, a deadline which was later extended by one week to 27 October."? The given citation only mentions the date extension, not the original dates.
  • The source provided for this sentence doesn't mention anything from the sentence: "An eight-member artistic committee consisting of Anastasios Symeonidis (chairperson), Petros Dourdoubakis (songwriter and radio producer), Dimitris Ktistakis (conductor), Alexis Kostas, Mihalis Messinis (composer), Andreas Pylarinos (conductor), Giannis Spyropoulos (orchestrator) and Tsaras Pantazis (radio producer) reviewed the received submissions and selected five candidate entries to participate in the national final." Replace with another source.
  • Link Lisbon City Hall.
  • Merge the sentence starting with "The two semi-finals and the final were televised" with the paragraph before it in order to avoid one-sentence paragraphs. — Golden call me maybe? 15:44, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Golden: thanks for the review. I have made the changes you requested. Please let me know if there is anything else of concern. Grk1011 (talk) 18:56, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Grk1011: Excellent, all points are addressed. Another thing: I see you've changed the "|website" parameters in cite web templates to "|publisher", which shouldn't be done unless the publisher is different from the website owner, which isn't the case in most (probably all) instances in this article. I'll be happy to pass once this is corrected. — Golden call me maybe? 19:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
It was mainly to fix the error where "website=" italicizes the name. In the past I had been asked to do this to fix that. If that's no longer the case then I'm happy to switch them over, but I want to make sure it's a consistent request! Grk1011 (talk) 19:23, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
I've never heard of such an issue; "|publisher=" should not be used solely to de-italicize the website's name. I still advise switching them. — Golden call me maybe? 19:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Golden: Done. Grk1011 (talk) 20:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Passed. — Golden call me maybe? 20:07, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply