Talk:Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2017/GA1

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Onegreatjoke (talk · contribs) 16:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I'm Onegreatjoke and i'm here to review another one of your nominations. Comments will come tomorrow. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Prose has been addressed and spotchecks are all clear. passing! Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:14, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):  
    b. (citations to reliable sources):  
    c. (OR):  
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):  
    b. (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:  

(Criteria marked   are unassessed)

Prose edit

Background

  • "by the renaming of NERIT as ERT" Should it be the "by renaming NERIT to ERT" or something similar because that seems weirdly worded.

Artist Selection

  • "Previously the broadcaster had said that they would select the entry internally, however they reconsidered, seeing Ellinikós Telikós, the Greek selection event, as a revenue source." I feel like it should either be "...entry internally, however, they reconsidered," or "...entry internally. However, they reconsidered,"
  • "...with her song to be selected though a three-song national final." should be through.

Ellinikós Telikós 2017

  • "was televised on ERT1, ERT HD and ERT World as well as" should be a comma after ERT HD.
  • "Former Eurovision contestants Sergey Lazarev, Helena Paparizou, Ani Lorak and Sakis Rouvas also appeared on screen" comma after Ani Lorak.

Preparations and promotion

  • "final version of the song and its accompanying music video were revealed on 13 March" feel like 'was' is a better thing to say there than were.
  • "promoted the song throughout Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland." comma after Denmark.

At Eurovision

  • "(France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom)" comma after Spain.
  • "were televised in Greece on ERT1, ERT HD and ERT World" Comma after ERT HD.

Performances

  • "featured Demy standing on a leveled podium and a hologram screen which appeared in front of the singer" I feel that it would be better to replace 'which' with 'that'.
  • "Demy was joined by three off-stage backing vocalists: Erasmia Markidi, Evgenia Liakou and Paris Paraskevadis-Planets." comma after Evgenia Liakou.

Voting

  • "two sets of points from 1-8, 10 and 12:" comma after 10.
  • "and the overall impression by the act." I think 'by' should be replaced with 'of'.
  • "Vicky Gerotheodorou (jury chairperson), Xenia Ghali, Dimitris Ouggarezos [el], Akis Anastasiadis and Aris Petrakis." comma after Akis Anastasiadis.

That seems to be all for prose! Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Onegreatjoke: the above have been addressed. Grk1011 (talk) 01:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Onegreatjoke: checking in just in case this fell off your radar. Grk1011 (talk) 02:23, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'll see if I can work on this tomorrow. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Spotchecks edit

  • [1] looks good.
  • [8] looks good.
  • [9] looks good.
  • [10] looks good.
  • [14 and 15] Looks good.
  • [18 and 19] looks good.
  • [27 and 28] looks good.
  • [47] looks good.
  • [44] looks good.

Spotchecks look alright Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:11, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.