This subject is not notable enough for a stand-alone article. It may merit a section within the Doonesbury article. This article has no sources whatsoever. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:02, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- I concur. This is not a Doonesbury wiki (although such a project would be awesome, in its own time-devouring way). --Orange Mike | Talk 18:23, 25 March 2011 (UTC)